Post by account_disabled on Feb 24, 2024 6:42:02 GMT
Google has announced an update to its Guidelines for humans responsible for evaluating search results. Which partly, but only partly, answers a question that was raised some time ago and which specifically concerned the quality of the results that are then offered to end users when they choose Google to do an online search. Speaking of specific contents that have to do with the world of food and research, someone asked for clarification on the way in which the algorithm organizes the ranking of this content and had heard the answer (the discussion had opened on the social network which once we called Twitter) that some matters were automated based on what is generally deemed useful. google guidelines have changed, updates to the human factor Updates to Google Guidelines, new evaluations for human evaluators. But the algorithm works and is also refined based on the evaluations given by external bodies whose purpose is precisely to give the votes. Somewhere there is still some humanity. Even if this humanity has Guidelines to follow.
The latest updates to the Assessor Guidelines The biggest America Mobile Number List update in the recent past to the Guidelines for those whose job it is to evaluate what algorithms offer in a series of simulated searches was in December of last year . And on that occasion there had actually been a very important change. For those who navigate following the current of Google's algorithms, there is in fact an acronym that is considered a north star and at the same time a compass for all decisions: EEAT. the google algorithm and the human factor, the updated guidelines Google Guidelines, new updates after a year It is an acronym whose letters hide four key words: Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness . And by now we're all used to the idea of having to create content that tries to turn on all four light bulbs.
But until December last year there were three bulbs. In fact, the second E was still missing, the one relating to experience. An experience which, as explained on the Search Central Blog, is exactly what you would think: the direct experience of whoever is building the content which is then indexed. This fits into the big idea that content should be valuable to users in the sense that it should provide useful information and in its best possible form . Compared to the change that occurred last year, this year's change is smaller but still allows us to sift through, which should be done periodically anyway, some of the items that concern the evaluation of content made by the human eye . To embrace the most recent innovations, for example, some of the examples have been changed taking those from the most popular platforms.
The latest updates to the Assessor Guidelines The biggest America Mobile Number List update in the recent past to the Guidelines for those whose job it is to evaluate what algorithms offer in a series of simulated searches was in December of last year . And on that occasion there had actually been a very important change. For those who navigate following the current of Google's algorithms, there is in fact an acronym that is considered a north star and at the same time a compass for all decisions: EEAT. the google algorithm and the human factor, the updated guidelines Google Guidelines, new updates after a year It is an acronym whose letters hide four key words: Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness . And by now we're all used to the idea of having to create content that tries to turn on all four light bulbs.
But until December last year there were three bulbs. In fact, the second E was still missing, the one relating to experience. An experience which, as explained on the Search Central Blog, is exactly what you would think: the direct experience of whoever is building the content which is then indexed. This fits into the big idea that content should be valuable to users in the sense that it should provide useful information and in its best possible form . Compared to the change that occurred last year, this year's change is smaller but still allows us to sift through, which should be done periodically anyway, some of the items that concern the evaluation of content made by the human eye . To embrace the most recent innovations, for example, some of the examples have been changed taking those from the most popular platforms.